"Caretaker"
Links

BATES
ARCHIVE
FEATURES
ARCHIVE
"The Caretaker" was
transferred from the Arts Theatre to the Duchess last night.
This is the least puzzling and the most pleasing play that Mr
Harold Porter [sic] has yet written...
-The Times
"Now it
may very well be that there are symbols here. The two brothers
may represent the bifurcated halves of a schizoid personality;
alternatively, the landlord may stand for the Super-Ego, the
tenant for the Ego, and the tramp for the Id..."
-Kenneth
Tynan
"...where
most playwrights devote their technical efforts to making us
wonder what will happen next, Mr Pinter focuses our wonder on
what is happening now. Who are these people?..."
-The Observer
"Donald
Pleasence makes a remarkable creation of the tramp. Peter Woodthorpe
rises finely to his opportunities as the afflicted brother, and
Alan Bates gives a hard clear edge to the sane one."
-Daily Telegraph
|
|
t h
e a t r e
The Caretaker
Bates Archive Spotlight April
2000, 40th anniversary of the play's premiere
First presented at the Arts Theatre, 27 April 1960
Transferred to the Duchess Theatre 30 May 1960
LONDON CAST:
Mick: Alan Bates
Aston: Peter Woodthorpe
Davies: Donald Pleasence
directed by Donald McWhinnie, setting and lighting
by Brian Currah
The Tramp in the Pleasure Dome
by Nicholas de Jongh
ALAN BATES, then hardly known, was considering the role of
Hotspur in "Henry IV" for television when "The
Caretaker" arrived. "I told my agent that I didn't
know what the play was about but it was unusual. My agent said,
'You'll do it over my dead body.' But I did. And after the first
night he came round saying, 'It's wonderful, never listen to
me again.'"
It was wonderful for
the audience as well. Pleasence recalls, "We had that precious
sort of audience who then came to what was a sort of fringe -
50 percent of them Press. After five minutes - with the reference
to the monastery at Luton - they were falling about in their
seats. It was a triumph of comedy."
 The critics ate their
old words, accepting what they had refused to accept in "The
Birthday Party." "Harold Pinter has begun to fulfill
the promise that I signally failed to see in "The Birthday
Party,'" wrote Kenneth Tynan. "This is a play and a
production which no one who is concerned with the advance of
the British drama can afford to miss," judged the Daily
Mail.
These vignettes of
1960 reveal two important things. They show the London theatre
at a point of transition. Its old function as a frivolous, class-bound
reactionary pleasure dome was being subverted by new playwrights.
The responses of Hobson and Roose-Evans, Codron, Pleasence and
Bates suggest there were already people who were demanding different
things of plays, expecting different methods. They did not see
plays as jigsaw puzzles which provided all answers, but scrambled
messages which, like life itself, were puzzling, partially indecipherable
and ambivalent. These people, like Pinter himself, were heralds
of new theatre worlds. ...
Before the play could
transfer from the Arts, which was not subject to censorship,
it had to be submitted to the Lord Chamberlain. One word, "arse-hole,"
turned out to be the sticking point. "Arse-hole," Pleasence
recalls the Lord Chamberlain's Controller saying. "I doubt
whether his Lordship has ever sanctioned an arse-hole."
And arse-hole was banned. As "The Caretaker" [returned
to the West End in 1991] it is worth noting that Pinter and all
dramatists are now free to have as many arse-holes as they like.
It is another and most important difference between then and
now. |||
From the Theatre World Annual, No. 11, Review of the Year,
1960:
"...The
obvious choice for our jacket and frontispiece illustration this
time was Harold Pinter's "The Caretaker," which was
first presented at the Arts Theatre before transferring to the
Duchess. Previously London had seen Mr Pinter's "The Birthday
Party" (Lyric, Hammersmith, May 1958) and the double bill
consisting of "The Room" and "The Dumb Waiter"
(Royal Court, March 1960). It is very difficult indeed to analyse
this young playwright's genius, for on the surface his work breaks
all the hitherto-accepted laws of good theatre.
In "The Caretaker"
his three characters are, strictly speaking, quite unable to
communicate with each other; there are long pauses and nothing
tangible by way of plot. There builds up, however, a most remarkable
atmosphere of tension and suspense, and in Davies, the garrulous
character of the title role, Mr Pinter has created an immortal.
The humour is irresistible,
and there are strands of Beckett, with the big difference that
everything in "The Caretaker" could have happened any
day in London. The disconnected gas stove and other odd junk,
the Buddha and suspended bucket echoing at intervals with drops
of water from the leaking roof, all play their part, providing
the kind of stage props beloved of the author, though he emphatically
denies that his plays have any symbolic meaning. That "The
Caretaker" should have a popular appeal in the West End
is something to marvel at: Harold Pinter knows how to hypnotise
his audiences."
From The Tatler & Bystander, 15 June 1960:
 "...the little
piece is brilliantly directed by Mr Donald McWhinnie and brilliantly
acted by Mr Donald Pleasence, Mr Peter Woodthrope and Mr Alan
Bates. Mr Pleasence's bouts of ineffectual rage and groveling
misery are both comic and pathetic; and Mr Bates, playing the
most straightforward character straightforwardly, manages at
the end to compress the brothers' secret into a single nod and
a half-smile."
From The Times, 21 February 1961:
"Last
night Mr Harold Pinter took over the part of Mick in "The
Caretaker" from Mr Alan Bates who is on four weeks' leave
of absence. It could be a thankless task for the author himself
to fit in with the subtle interplay of two performances as finely
interknit as those of Mr Donald Pleasence and Mr Peter Woodthorpe,
but Mr Pinter's acting is wholly convincing.
He lacks, it is true,
the tense, mercurial worldliness brought in as some relief to
the atmosphere of defeat by Mr Bates. In return, Mr Pinter supplies
a brooding sarcasm which carries its own kind of threat. His
presence, timing and diction fulfill all the demands made."
The Caretaker" ended its West End run at the Duchess
Theatre on 27 May 1961 after 452 performances, with a profit
of £35,000.
IN CELEBRATING the "Caretaker" anniversary,
Pleasence scholar Christopher Weedman and I
have divided up a wealth of material between our two web sites.
Visit these four links to explore the 1960-61 productions,
the resulting film, and the 1991 London revival:
History |||.New
York, 1961 ||| Film, 1964 ||| Revival, 1991
If you have not seen "The Caretaker,"
I hope you'll spend a couple of hours reading it soon.
|
|